million copies of the issue but, hey, also more free publicity. i'm howard kurtz. if you missed our program, check us out on itunes every monday. just search for reliable sources. we're back here next sunday morning for another critical look at the media. "state of the union" with candy crowley begins right now. have bully pulpit, will travel. today from decatur to asheville and chicago, the president pushes gun control, a higher minimum wage and universal preschool. >> and that whole plan, well, others by the way, is a trade we could use more often in washington. >> a conversation with senator chuck schumer on the president's wish list and senate reality. what and when can the senate deliver? >> and, drawing the line. >> read my lips. i'm not interested in an 11th hour negotiation. >> republicans dig in from budget cuts to some of the president's nominees. we'll talk with a member of the

republican leadership team, senator john barrasso from wyoming, and mandatory spending cuts take effect 11 days from now. >> it would have destructive cuts on national security, defense. >> average wait times to clear customs will increase by 50%. >> all this is purely the collateral damage of political gridlock. >> senator jack reed of rhode island and intelligence committee chairman mike rogers on whether sequestration is that dire and that inevitable. >> sort of predictable. >> the head of the motion picture association deflects criticism that entertainment violence contributes to gun crime. that and more with our political roundtable. i'm candy crowley. and this is "state of the union." before taking his show on the road, the president laid out his agenda in front of congress. house speaker john boehner called it more of the same and suggested where the president could take his proposals.

>> the president likes to attack congress, but if he's serious about enacting his agenda, i think it must start with part of this congress it a his party controls, the united states senate. you know, what can he get passed in the united states senate? >> joining me now is the number three democrat in the senate, senator chuck schumer out of new york today. senator, thanks for joining us. >> good morning. >> let me ask you that question. we see the president. he wants to increase the minimum wage. he wants to do something about reducing carbon in the air, universal preschool, immigration, guns, more money for infrastructure. you know congress. i know congress. what is reasonable to expect you will get done this year? >> well, i think that there's going to be more done than most people think, and that's because -- >> and that would be what specifically do you think will get done? >> well, i think immigration has a very decent chance of getting done. we're working hard on a bipartisan proposal on guns.

i think we're going to avoid sequestration, and the proposal that we've made will prevail. i think that on some of these jobs issues, you heard eric cantor in a speech where he talked about the same issues that the president did, so i think you're going to find out on minimum wage, we're going to bring that to the floor this spring, and i think you're going to find we'll get more republican support than people think because the policy -- >> that's different than passing it, as you know. there's a lot of thought that the minimum wage, which appears to be something that's not going to clear congress is this year, is more about setting up 2014 to give democrats something to rail against republicans on. >> well, it is an issue of fairness. if you work 40 hours a week, you shouldn't be way below the poverty level. the minimum wage is at a lower level than 1960, and i think that you may find some republicans changing their minds on these issues. what i was saying, candy, i think there's a sea change in our politics.

the politics of obstruction, the politics of just cutting, cutting, cutting and shrinking, shrinking, shrinking, not things that need to be shrunk or cut, but everything across the board is losing clout. and i have seen it in many areas. our republican colleagues are coming to the middle to meet us. we'll have to come to the middle to meet them, too, but there will be less obstructionism. i can't predict which issues, but i predict it will be a more productive congress than the last one. >> let me take some of these issues one by one. first of all what, makes you think that sequestration will not take place which, boy, most people up there this week have said, yeah, it's going to happen, and that is the across-the-board spending cuts. >> here's what i think. i think democrats have the high ground, both substantively and politically, and we will win on this issue. why? the bottom line is very simple. the republicans are proposing devastating cuts. they would lose 750,000 jobs -- >> but you all agreed to these

across-the-board cuts. >> please, i would like to finish what i'm saying here. 750,000 jobs will be lost. the economy will shrink by 6%, and what we've produced is very simple. it's closing loopholes. the only people who support them are the people who benefit them from them, oil and gas loopholes, the idea that businesses shouldn't get breaks by sending jobs overseas, the idea that someone who makes over $1 million should pay a higher rate than others, and whether it's right on the eve of sequestration or if god forbid it has to take effect for a few days, the devastating effects will be so strong. the president will be out there on his bully pulpit that just like on the fiscal cliff republicans will come on board. they have no choice. their arguments are untenable and don't meet the favor of hardly anyone other than themselves and the few whose special interests they are protecting. >> let me move you on to immigration simply because we now see the white house sort of draft immigration bill, at least

the skeleton of it, has been leaked out there. we know that democrats had been saying to the white house we don't -- please don't put your proposal out there because these are very delicate negotiations. we see marco rubio, part of the bipartisan group that you are also working with on immigration, said the president's plan is dead on arrival. this leak cannot help the cause on capitol hill. >> well, look, i -- i don't know what bill the president has out there. i haven't seen it, but they did say last night when this leak occurred, and i don't know how it occurred, that it wasn't their final or complete bill. the president and those of us working on immigration are working very well. senators durbin, menendez and bennett and i met with the president wednesday, and he agreed to give us the space we need to come up with a bipartisan proposal, so we're working well together. i know that senator rubio was upset with this leak, but -- >> are you upset? >> we talked to him.

>> no, i am not upset. we've talked to senator rubio, and he's fully on board with our process, and i am very hopeful in march we will have a bipartisan bill. you know, it's obvious. if a democrat, the president or anyone else puts out what they want on their own, it's going to be different than what you have a bipartisan agreement, but only way we're going to get something done is with a bipartisan agreement, so i'm happy with the president. he's given us the space, and i'm optimistic we can get something done. >> i have to move on to guns now and ask you. you're also working on a deal and on a bipartisan basis. how close are you to a deal of putting bill on the floor about gun control? >> well, look, we have democrats and republicans, some of whom are pro nra, have been supported by the nra and some of whom like myself have been opposed by the nra sitting down trying to negotiate the sweet spot where we can get something done.

we're talking. we've made some good progress. there are still some hard issues to be resolved. guns is a very difficult issue, but our talks continue, and we've solved a good number of the problems. we have some significant problems still to overcome. >> what significant problems are there yet? >> well, i'm not going to get into the details of our negotiating publicly, but i can tell you we both made progress and have a ways to go. >> do you think that there will be any kind of assault weapons ban in your bill? >> well, i think that certainly senator feinstein has championed assault weapons, and it will be voted on by the senate. whether it's part of our bill, we've been focusing on universal background checks where i think there's a greater chance to come to a bipartisan agreement. >> and do you have at least within your group agreement about universal background checks, at least to include those gun shows?

>> we are. i'm not going to get into any details. there are many issues we've resolved and some we yet haven't. >> so as i understand you, you are looking at perhaps your bill and then maybe a separate vote on assault weapons which looks a lot less likely to pass, is that correct? >> senator leahy is going to determine the structure as we move through judiciary committee and senator reid as we move to the floor. >> but you're going to recommend something? >> we are hopefully going to recommend -- i'm certainly going to recommend; and hopefully it will be bipartisan, and hopefully it will have those, both supported by the nra and those opposed by the nra on it. >> and finally, is there a mental health component, do you think, in what your group is working on? >> well, there's one of the aspects of things we have to clear up is mental health records. the mental health records is part of the nix system are weak. five years ago i did negotiate

an improvement in that system with the nra support, and we're continuing to work in that area to tighten it up more than it was back in 2007. >> senator chuck schumer, thank you so much for joining me this morning. >> thank you. good to talk to you. >> appreciate it. should your pediatrician be allowed to ask you if you keep a gun in the house. president obama thinks so, but some republican lawmakers say it's an invasion of privacy. next up, i'll ask senator and dr. john barrasso. what's...that... on your head? can curlers! tomato basil, potato with bacon... we've got a lot of empty cans. [ male announcer ] progresso. you gotta taste this soup. schwab bank was built with all the value and convenience tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 investors want. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 like no atm fees, worldwide. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 and no nuisance fees. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 plus deposit checks with mobile deposit. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 and manage your cash and investments tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 with schwab's mobile app. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 no wonder schwab bank has grown to over 70 billion in assets. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 so if you're looking for a bank that's in your corner, tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 not just on the corner... tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 call, click or visit to start banking with schwab bank today. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550

with the bing it on challenge to show google users what they've been missing on bing. let's bing it on. [fight bell: ding, ding] how many here are google users? what if i was to tell you that you would actually like bing way more than google when it came to the results? prove it. let's look up some taco places. i like the left side. yeah? okay, do we need to find out what the waves are like down at the beach? what side do you like better? i like the results on the right. i'm gonna go with the one on the left. oh! bing won! people prefer bing over google for the web's top searches. don't believe it? go to bingiton.com and see what you're missing. ♪ let's go. ♪ ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] introducing the all-new cadillac xts... another big night on the town, eh? ...and the return of life lived large. ♪

yeah we both relieve coughs, sneezing, aches, fevers. and i relieve nasal congestion. overachiever. [ female announcer ] tylenol® cold multi-symptom nighttime relieves nasal congestion. nyquil® cold and flu doesn't. relieves nasal congestion. with so much competition, finding the right job is never easy. but with the nation's largest alumni network, including those in key hiring positions, university of phoenix can help connect you to a world of opportunity. i have to know the weather patterns. i upgraded to the new sprint direct connect. so i can get three times the coverage. [ manager 2 ] it's like working in a giant sandbox. with all these huge toys. and with the fastest push-to-talk...

i can keep track of them all. [ male announcer ] upgrade to the new "done" with access to the fastest push-to-talk and three times the coverage. now when you buy one kyocera duraxt rugged phone for $69.99, you'll get four free. other offers available. visit a sprint store, or call 855-878-4biz. visit a sprint store, why take exercise so seriously,when it can be fun? push-ups or sprints? what's wrong with fetch? or chase? let's do this larry! ooh, i got it, i got it! (narrator) the calorie-smart nutrition in beneful healthy weight... includes grains and real chicken, because a healthy dog is a playful dog. beneful healthy weight. find us on facebook to help put more play in your day. [ male announcer ] a car has a rather small rear-view mirror, so we can occasionally glance back at where we've been. it has an enormous windshield so we can look ahead to where we are going.

now is always the time to go forward. and reimagine all the possibilities that lie before us. an ally for real possibilities. aarp. find tools and guidance at aarp.org/possibilities. then you're going to love this. right now they're only $14.95! wow-a grt deal just got a whole lot better. hurry. $14.95 won't last. i'm going to go chuck hagel when i finish here and say i'm sorry, sorry this has happened. i'm sorry for the president. i'm sorry for the country and i'm sorry for you, but we're not going to give up on you. >> democrats vowing to stand by their man, even as republicans

delivered a sharp rebuke to fellow republican chuck hagel this week in his bid to become defense secretary. joining me now is republican senator john barrasso from wyoming. senator, thanks for being here. >> thank you, candy. >> something caught our eye that senator mccain said in explaining the republican -- part of the republican resistance to hagel in which he says it goes back to there's a lot of ill will towards senator hagel because when he was a republican, he attacked president bush mercilessly, at one point said he was the worst president since herbert hoover and said that the surge was the worst blunder since the vietnam war which is nonsense and was very anti his own party and people. people don't forget that. is this a revenge vote? mean, this seems -- i understand that people, a lot of republicans who personally don't like chuck hagel but is that a vote against him? >> that's not a reason. the reason is if anyone saw his testimony. it was very unsettling. it was weak and wobbly, and, you

know, you want competence and confidence in the person that is going to be secretary of defense, and what we saw was a lot of confusion by this nominee. so what we're doing is just asking for some information, a little more time to get some more of the speeches that he's given, to see what he said because he said one thing on one day when it's popular and then at another time says another thing. the defense department -- this is a very, very important job. this is the number one employer of the united states, and we need to have somebody there who can manage that, do it well and give confidence to our military. >> do you worry that there is a line between being the loyal opposition and being labeled as obstructionist, and you know that that's where democrats are going now, saying they say no to everything. this is unprecedented, et cetera, et cetera. do you think holding up the hagual vote was worth it and do you think it puts another chink in the party image? >> this is a nomination that's

being rushed through by the democrats. the hearings were only two weeks ago. the vote in the committee was just last week. there really shouldn't be a rush in something of this importance. all we've asked is for another week, asked a number of questions. they have continued to obstruct this. president said he have the most transparent administration in the history of the country. why are they trying to hide and not allow us to get some information so we can vote a week from now? >> you sound a little bit as though you'll vote against him. >> i have grave reservations. i think he's been wrong about iran, wrong about israel, wrong in iraq, wrong with nuclear weapons, absolutely i plan to vote against him. >> so do you think that the sort of discussion that has come up and the hold or whatever you want to call it that you've put on the hagel nomination, which we still expect to pass, do you think that harms soon-to-be, if you agree with that, secretary hagel in his dealings with congress? is he rendered less effective by this process?

>> he's going to be less effective because of the fact that the president nominated him. there were a lot of democrats on capitol hill that don't believe he was the best choice, and i'm sure the white house is very disturbed with how poorly he did during his confirmation hearings. i think it will impact him as he tries to limp across the finish line to get confirmed. i don't believe this is obstructionist. john kerry just got confirmed a week or two ago for secretary of state, 96, 97 positive votes in his favor, but the cabinet is in chaos right now because of so many resignations, and i think we have another seven or eight to confirm. >> what about john brennan then, nominated to be head of the cia. he's had his hearings. >> had his hearings. not come up for a vote. there are questions by both democrats and republicans, questions about drones, questions about benghazi, lots of questions both sides of the aisle so they are not making a political statement on him because democrats have legitimate questions that they want answers to. >> what is your state of mind when it comes to a confirmation

vote on brennan? >> i still want to review the hearing. they have classified hearings and then those that are not classified. i've seen the public. i want to read some of the other information. >> are you leaning one way or the other? not at this point. >> how about jack lew, treasury secretary? >> jack lew, a long history of public service. but they have to ask and answer questions regarding his time on wall street, the large bonus payment that he got not too long before the big bailout of the group that he was working for on wall street. his investments in the cayman islands for which the president criticized mitt romney, so we need an administration that doesn't say, you know, do as i say, not as i do. tim geithner, the former treasury secretary, i voted against him because he hadn't paid his taxes. american people deserve answers to these questions because the treasury secretary, candy, works not for the president or for congress, works for the american people. >> i don't know if you heard senator schumer at the top of the show. he was talking about sequestration.

he expressed the belief either on the eve of or sometime in the first two or three weeks of sequestration if it goes into effect, the big across-the-board budget cuts, that republicans indeed will come to the middle and agree to essentially what the democrats have proposed which is some cuts in farm programs as well as closing the loopholes for oil and gas companies as well as taxing more the so-called buffet tax, that no millionaire should pay less than 30%. he said that your current position, republican current position is untenable given what sequestration will do. do you think republicans will go ahead and agree to some kind of cuts and perhaps an increase in revenue for those making $1 million or more? >> no. let me be very clear, and would i say thiso the president as i say it to you. these spending cuts are going to go through on march 1st. taxes are off the table.

i've read the democrat proposal that even chuck schumer said is just a chess piece, so the american people need to know tax cuts are off the table, and the republican party is not in any way going to trade spending cuts for a tax increase. >> so you -- you have heard all these dire warnings, so you think republicans are willing to walk off this particular cliff and say, no, we are not going to raise taxes in order to stop these across-the-board cuts which will dig deeply into the defense budget, among other things. >> i think there are much better ways to do the budget cuts, and i welcome that sort of discussion with the president, but the cuts are going to occur. we're talking about 2.5% of what we spend this year, and this is just the first year of ten years of cuts, so you have to be realistic about this. families all across the country, candy, have had their budgets cut by larger than that as a result of the economic downturn.

>> you don't believe all the dire warnings that it's going to hollow out the military, that it's going to interfere with getting on to planes, it's going stop food inspection, you don't believe any of that. >> i believe the president has a lot of authority that he can decide how this works, and, yeah, he can make it very uncomfortable, which i think would be a mistake on the part of the president, but when you take a look at the total dollars there are better ways to do this, but the cuts are going to occur. >> let me ask you. the american academy of pediatrics has backed the idea that pediatricians certainly should or could ask their -- their young patients' parents whether or not there's a gun in the house. the president in executive order said they wouldn't bar that from happening. what do you think of the general idea? you're a doctor. you've practiced to saying to a patient do you have a gun in the house? >> this has been a position of the american academy of pediatrics for a long time. they have a number of things they recommend that most gun

owners, responsible individuals, do in their own homes when there are children in the homes. there is no role for the government to tell doctors what they should or should not ask the patients or families, and i really see a focus more if they worked on the mental health components with the pediatricians than what they have or cannot do in talking to their patients. >> senator john barrasso of wyoming, thanks for being in washington this weekend. >> thanks for having me. >> appreciate it. >> thanks, candy. another looming fiscal crisis is set to bring us a lot of pain and some are warning will make us less safe. >> members of congress need to understand that they were elected to protect the public, not to hurt the public. >> senator jack reed and congressman mike rogers on what to brace for if congress can't break the budget gridlock next. you know who you are. you can part a crowd, without saying a word... if you have yet to master the quiet sneeze... you stash tissues like a squirrel stashes nuts...

well muddlers, muddle no more. try zyrtec®. it gives you powerful allergy relief. and zyrtec® is different than claritin® because zyrtec® starts working at hour one on the first day you take it. claritin® doesn't start working until hour three. zyrtec®. love the air.

claritin® doesn't start working until hour three. chances are, you're not made of money, so don't overpay for motorcycle insurance. geico, see how much you could save. progress-oh! [ female announcer ] with 40 delicious progresso soups at 100 calories or less, there are plenty of reasons people are saying "progress-oh!" share your progress-oh! story on facebook.

we'll protect to the extent we can capabilities that are critical to our new defense strategy, but the reality is we can't protect much of which is of value. >> it's a reduction in intelligence capability, training, reduction in our aviation training, so all of these will have an impact on

providing much of the enabling support that we've provided to special operations forces. >> it will put the nation at greater risk of coercion, and it will break paste with men and women in uniform. >> the nation's top military leaders raising the alarm bell before automatic budget cuts go into effect march 1st. joining me now senator jack reed of rhode island and congressman mike rogers of michigan. thank you both so much. we had sort of two different versions here so far on the show, and that is senator schumer saying i think it will get a deal, and it will include a tax on the wealthy, and we heard senator barrasso saying it's not going to happen. these cuts are going into effect. it's hard for me to believe that things are as dire as these military men lay out and congress is going to let it happen. >> these are serious challenges to the military, secretary carter, general odierno and general dempsey made a very

compelling case before the budget of services committee and the appropriations committee. i don't think it has to happen. senator reid, harry reid, proposed legislation that would dover the sequestration to the next year. it would be paid for in a balanced way by additional revenue as well as additional -- >> tax hikes. >> indeed. >> -- cuts in spending and that's the way to proceed in avoiding the blunt across-the-board cuts and getting us chance to get back into the regular order, proposing a budget, doing an appropriations bill. >> and we should point out, it's been the democrats who have been in charge of the senate who haven't come up with a budget for the last four years so that's why we haven't had a regular one. >> he had the budget control act of 2011 which set the caps, which was budgetary and not a resolution between the two houses. we're working on a budget right now and need to get that done. we need time. the sequestration will preempt us from getting a budget done

and other factors. >> it's kind of always that you guys need more time and can we put it off until next year. i guess to me it's a little bit like the fiscal cliff only now it involves the military and these men saying, we won't be able to do this and the force will be hollowed out. et cetera, et cetera. answer me this. if these cuts not just go into effect but are allowed to stay into effect, let's say nothing gets done even after that march 1st deadline, will the u.s. be less safe as a result of these across-the-board cuts? >> a couple of things. first of all, the president lined this up in a way that put us in this problem. by calling for an across-the-boards cut in the military and intelligence business. that's dangerous. it means that they can't manage -- >> can i just say you all agreed to it. >> yes. but this was the proposal by the president so some notion that it has been shifted to the republicans, i want to see a way

out of this for the simple reason that the across-the-board cut, it is damaging to our national security and our national defense for the simple reason that they can't manage the reductions in spending. i argue the best way to go through this sequester, and i do believe we're going to go into this, is give the agencies the ability to manage those reductions so that they can move money around without across-the-board cuts, because it could mean things like the second carrier group doesn't show up in the med. it means that some thousands of intelligence professionals -- >> so take the overall number and allow the various departments to say, okay, this program goes away. >> right. >> but that saves this program, et cetera. >> exactly. >> but i think there's another aspect here, too, even if you are -- give flexibility, you still have significant reduction. it's not just defense. it's education and border security. >> sure. >> so there's a better try do this, and that's the way we propose by simply arithmetic. if it it's all cuts, it's going to be very, very difficult.

that's why i think you need additional revenue. >> senator mcconnell called it a political stunt, the democrats' proposal, because it includes that millionaires tax which frankly i don't know how many votes you all had in the senate on the millionaires taxes but it never passes. >> it's something i think most americans would be extremely supportive of. it would essentially say people over $1 million would be paying roughly the same rate as those middle class americans who are working very hard. that's fair, and it also will allow us -- >> they also just got a tax hike. >> for $1 million and above it would preserve the charitable deductions. >> the challenge here is the president made the argument everything will be fine if we get the wealthier to may more in taxes. he got that. you can't get that and come right back and say the wealthier need to pay more in taxes so he's gone after seniors that are doing better. now he's going after americans who are doing better in the economy. he got that. now he's coming back saying if i can tax more and then he proposed in his state of the

union address more spending. and the problem here is, candy, the greatest threat to our national security is the debt and the deficit long term. that's why those of us who are very interested in national security, trying to get this right, trying to make sure we posture ourselves and put ourselves in a position to defend the country, are so worried about the debt and deficit debate. we can get through this. we can do it in a way i think that is respectful to what american priorities are, but you have to do it in a way that doesn't hurt us long term. >> it's important to say we've had about $2.4 trillion in cuts from the approved baseline. 1.7 trillion of those are spending cuts. $700 billion are revenue. unless we get back to a more balanced approach, we can't cut our way to national security. we can't cut our way to investing in education, research and development. we just have to get back to a balance, and i think the american people understand that. >> let me ask you, i want to ask

you a quick question about chuck hagel and the problems that he's had getting his nomination through, and that is strictly political question. the president knew going in that this would be a tough fight for him, that chuck hagel s not the most popular guy on capitol hill. do you think that the president, and yes, he liked chuck hagel and the work from him, et cetera, would do this because they would rather have the republican do these kind of cuts to the pentagon than a democrat? >> boy, i don't think that was his -- he worked for something that was in the national security space, chuck hagel did, for some period of time. i think he built a relationship with the president. he is a vietnam veteran, a decorated vietnam veteran at that, and that's why the president selected him. the problem was, the senate now and certainly senator reed can talk to him better than i can, having difficulty both sides of the aisle, to see if he's ready and able to lead the pentagon. >> i think mike is exactly right

about why he was chosen, he has the experience, not only as a combat veteran, as a business leader and the second deputy head of the v.a. in the reagan administration. he's got the confidence of the president. i don't think this was designed to provoke a fight. i think in fact what's happened is very unusual, unprecedented review, asking for speeches, going back five years, asking for all sorts of material we've never requested of confirmation before. we're confident that we'll get the confirmation concluded when we return at the end of the week. >> a quick yes or no, about the use of drones overseas and using them to target americans overseas. al awlaki and his son killed, you think there's plenty of oversight for this drone program. were you told in advance? >> for the planning purposes of air strikes against terrorists

and enemy combatants overseas, yes. >> these specific men? >> if people make the target list, we know that in advance. there's appropriate oversight and how we target those individuals changes from day to day, but air strikes are certainly a part that have. >> congressman rogers, senator reed, thank you for joining us this morning. >> thank you very much. pope benedict makes one of his final appearances in st. peter's square. our news headlines are up late. and later senator turned lobbyist chris dodd says don't blame violent movies for gun crimes. all waking up. connecting to the global phenomenon we call the internet of everything. ♪ it's going to be amazing. and exciting. and maybe, most remarkably, not that far away. we're going to wake the world up. and watch, with eyes wide, as it gets to work. cisco. tomorrow starts here.

[ dog ] you know, i just don't think i should have to wait for it! who do you think i am, quicken loans? ♪ at quicken loans, we won't make you wait for it. our efficient, online system allows us to get you through your home loan process fast. which means you'll never have to beg for a quick closing. one more way quicken loans is engineered to amaze. bonkers, look at me when i'm talking to you. has oats that can help lower cholesterol? and it tastes good?

sure does! ♪ wow. [ buzz ] delicious, right? yeah. it's the honey, it makes it taste so... ♪ well, would you look at the time... what's the rush? bee happy. bee healthy. with clusters of flakes and o's. oh, ho ho... it's the honey sweetness. i...i mean, you...love. so i used my citi thankyou card to pick up some accessories. a new belt. some nylons. and what girl wouldn't need new shoes? and with all the points i've been earning, i was able to get us a flight to our favorite climbing spot even on a holiday weekend. ♪ things are definitely looking up. [ male announcer ] with no blackout dates, you can use your citi thankyou points to travel whenever you want. visit citi.com/thankyoucards to apply.

our political panel is next, but first a check of the headlines. the golf channel is reporting that president obama is playing golf today with tiger woods. the president is spending the weekend in florida and took golf lessons yesterday from woods' former coach. at least 21 people were killed and 125 others wounded in a series of car bombs and roadside exmroelgzs today in iraq. recent attacks have spread fear among iraqis that sectarian violence may be overtaking the country, again. in one of his final public appearances pope benedict xvi led thousands in a prayer for faith this morning.

he thanked the faithful for their prayers and asked to pray for the next pope. the family of jesse jackson jr. is speaking out in support of the former chicago congressman. jackson has admitted to misusing campaign funds for personal expenses, including a $43,000 watch and some fur coats. his brother talked about how jackson is handling recent events. >> still under a strict regimen with the doctors and he's had to deal with a compounding issues of his health, as well as legal issues and, so, he's been working through both simultaneously. so, we ask that you continue to be mindful. but he's not able to speak for himself. >> jesse jackson jr. could be sentenced to as many as five years in prison. and those are the headlines. next, the house speaker says if the president wants something done, he's got to get the senate on board first. will john boehner's strategy

backfire? our political panel is next. ♪ [ male announcer ] were you more interesting in your twenties, or now? when you were starting out? or after a few decades working in some well-worn character? experience makes you wiser for the wear. and now come the richer possibilities. [ children laughing ] aarp. an ally for real possibilities. find tools and resources at aarp.org/possibilities.

[ nyquil bottle ] just reading your label. wait...you relieve nasal congestion? sure don't you? [ nyquil bottle ] dude! [ female announcer ] tylenol® cold multi-symptom nighttime relieves nasal congestion. nyquil® cold and flu doesn't. relieves nasal congestion. google's backyard for the wbing it on challenge.. [fight bell: ding, ding] what's your preferred search engine? search engine, uhh, probably google. if we do a side by side blind test comparison, and you end up choosing google, you get an xbox. i'll bet you the xbox, you bet me your son. well let's look up what you need. okay, i would do the left. yeah? what?! i am a daddy! bing wins it! bing won. bing did win. people prefer bing over google for the web's top searches. don't believe it? go to bingiton.com and see what you're missing. i need you. i feel so alone. but you're not alone. i knew you'd come. like i could stay away. you know i can't do this without you.

you'll never have to. you're always there for me. shh! i'll get you a rental car. i could also use an umbrella. fall in love with progressive's claims service. i just served my mother-in-law your chicken noodle soup but she loved it so much... i told her it was homemade. everyone tells a little white lie now and then. but now she wants my recipe [ clears his throat ] [ softly ] she's right behind me isn't she? [ male announcer ] progresso. you gotta taste this soup. [ slap! ] [ male announcer ] your favorite foods fighting you? fight back fast with tums. calcium-rich tums starts working so fast you'll forget you had heartburn. ♪ tum tum tum tum tums

[ male announcer ] engine light on? come to meineke now for a free code scan read and you'll say...my money. my choice. my meineke. steven latourette, ron klain and jeff zeleny and dana bash join me now. i want to talk about what chris dodd, former senator from connecticut, now head of the motion picture association, he was asked whether he thought motion pictures, the entertainment media in general, adds to gun violence. here's what he said. >> well, it's sort of predictable in a way, and the -- if you go back over the years, i mean, there were people who suggested that comic books were the reason for people doing

things, before any of this existed. >> didn't exactly say no, it has nothing to do with it, but he said what we ought to do is be looking at mental health. but i want to play something his fellow connecticut senator said, also a former senator, joe lieberman, about the entertainment industry and violence. >> i think the entertainment culture has to accept some responsibility. you know, in almost every one of these cases of mass shootings, it's the same pattern. a young man, troubled, reclusive, almost always involved in some kind of violent entertainment media gets guns and then kills a lot of people. >> and, yeah, all we're hearing on capitol hill is an assault weapons ban and universal background checks, nothing about mental health other than we want our records to be better about people who shouldn't have guns but not about caring for those who are mentally ill or finding care, and nothing about the

media. why is that? >> well, first of all, asking senator dodd about gun violence and movies is like asking the ceo of mcdonald's if a big mac is good for you. let me say that. i think he's right. i think it's mental illness. a great letter that went viral that said i'm adam lanza's mother that talked about her difficulty in getting her son, i believe it was, treatment, and where senator lieberman is right, i would add one other thing, five of the last six horrific shootings have been young, white men, late teens, early 20s, who have untreated mental illness, and until you get to that problem, you're really not going to get to the problem. >> you know, the president said i think in his first statement when he did the joe biden panel said i want mental health treatment to be as accessible as guns are and no one said a word about it. >> that's something that the folks at the white house have looked at, congress has looked at. look, congress has to do what congress can do. we have a first amendment. can't really do about the media culture, no matter how we feel about it.

what it can do is what the president challenged it in the state of the union to do, which is to give the victims of these horrible crimes an up or down vote on universal background checks, an up or down vote on banning military-style weapons and an up or down vote on modernizing making sure guns stay out of hands that people who shouldn't have them. thets congress' job. that's the business that needs to get done here in washington now. >> is it going to get done? sounded to me like schumer said they sound fairly close. there will be separate packages. they will cut off assault weapons from the package they will pass. >> the up or down vote, certainly the most rousing part of his state of the union speech, but a lot of senate democrats sitting out in the audience don't want to vote yes on this so they will vote no. that's probably good for their politics back home in arkansas and louisiana and other places. it is sort of striking that we're just talking about that. the white house does not seem to me to be pushing the whole package. we haven't heard from the vice president in a while on all that.

we'll see if that changes. >> part of the reason for that, i mean, ron, correct me if i'm wrong, the white house gets the delicate politics of that, just like immigration, the president needs to use the bully pulpit but at the same point if they are making bipartisan progress, which i'm told they really are. senator schumer and senator coburn, an a-rating from the nra, don't touch it. because the minute the president touches it, it could blow the whole thing up. >> or leaks a plan. >> or something like that. >> the president, we've heard aggressive, ambitious, however you want to describe his agenda for the second term. he clearly is back to his transformative presidential mode, that he wants to be remembered as actually changing the way business is done, changing the way budgets are done, et cetera. does this put him at odds with senator harry reid, for instance, who needs to keep a majority, or would like to keep a majority in the senate, and as dana mentions, he's got some senators in reagan -- i'm sorry, reagan, whoa, in mitt romney won

states that could lose on votes on immigration, on gun control. are they at odds? >> i don't know if he's at odds with senator reid, but senator reid's first statement on the assault weapons ban is he couldn't bring it up in the senate because he has five or six red state democrats that are up for re-election in 2014, and it's a very delicate issue. the president has been bold in both his inaugural address and the state of the union address. and i think if he focused on what was doable rather than sort of this wish list, he could get a lot done. but what we find here in washington, both parties, is that they want to overplay their hands and go for what i want rather than what i can do. >> well, exactly. isn't there some thought that when you look at things like minimum wage. when you look at some of the other things on the president's agenda, those look more like political talking points for 2013 into 2014 than they do actual things that could happen. >> i don't think so, candy. i think what the president has set forward is bold, but achievable. i think times have changed.

>> minimum wage. >> setting the minimum wage at $9, which just buys back the purchasing power they had had ten years ago is a pretty reasonable and achievable goal and doing something about guns, i think there is bipartisan support for that. i think the real issue here is whether or not we'll let the boehner rule, what used to be call the hastert rule that somebody can come to the floor of the house and let majority of republicans support it. those things have to come up. we have to have majority rule, not the boehner rule. >> but there isn't a boehner rule. he doesn't do that. >> we'll see on guns and immigration. >> now might be different -- but, look, to your point about red state democrats, somebody who covers capitol hill, as soon as the president initiates something, i don't go to republicans, i go to the conservative democrats to figure out if something is doable. that's the dynamic, no question about it. got to go there first before you think about republicans. >> hang on for me, we'll be right back and we'll have a final look at what is doable and

what isn't. [ female announcer ] with 40 delicious progresso soups at 100 calories or less, there are plenty of reasons people are saying "progress-oh!" share your progress-oh! story on facebook.

but with advair, i'm breathing better. so now i can be in the scene. advair is clinically proven to help significantly improve lung function. unlike most copd medications, advair contains both an anti-inflammatory and a long-acting bronchodilator working together to help improve your lung function all day. advair won't replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be used more than twice a day. people with copd taking advair may have a higher chance of pneumonia. advair may increase your risk of osteoporosis and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking advair.

if you're still having difficulty breathing, ask your doctor if including advair could help improve your lung function. get your first full prescription free and save on refills at advaircopd.com.

we should take on once and for all the issue of illegal immigration.

we should be working on comprehence was immigration reform right now. the time has come to pass comprehensive reform. the american people need a tax code that helps -- we need to change our tax code. simplify the tax code. focus on the hardest problems on clean energy. i will not walk away from the promise of clean energy. as long as countries like china keep going in on clean energy, so must we. our first priority is making america a magnet for new jobs in manufacturing. this blue print begins with american manufacturing. all of which is to say is what gets said in the state of the union does not necessarily get done, at least not right away. let me ask you, immigration, reforming the tax code, some kind of carbon tax and manufacturing, you know, cleaning up the voting system, raising the minimum wage. what's really going to happen?

>> i do agree with senator schumer from before that immigration reform in some form is doable. i think some movement on universal background checks is doable. who doesn't like manufacturing? it's like world peace. we can throw that in there, too. you know, washington is really like groundhog's day and the only thing i noticed from those clips is that boehner and biden keep switching ties from year to year. >> purple ties are in. >> ron, what -- take the other side and be honest with me. what's out there as a political weapon and not really doable realistically? >> well, i think the political weapon will be if this stuff doesn't get done. you know, the clips show that a lot of these items have been on the agenda for two, three, four years. the president is being very aggressive about saying, okay, it's time to get this done. immigration, close tax loopholes, raise the minimum wage. universal pre-k. a self-inflicted wound by republicans if they don't act on these things. the public wants action. that was the message of 2012. the president has heard that loud and clear.

he's making the press for action and now we'll see what the republicans and congress do. >> do you agree? >> the senate democrats, as dana was talking about earlier. specifically on energy and climate. a lot of those senators mary landrieu, mark prior and some others who are up in 2014 that don't want to take those votes. if anything happens on energy and climate, you have to wonder if it's an executive action. i think the white house is going to be much more aggressive on that in the second term. >> the epa, some power there -- >> as for immigration, there is this leaked proposal over the weekend. the white house is trying to stay out of it and at least be the best i can tell in trying to make this work. of course, it makes sense for senator rubio to be out there against the white house because he needs that for his base. but i still think something will likely happen on immigration. >> immigration, gun control -- >> i think immigration is by far the most likely. what surprised me this week is that i was at a breakfast with john boehner the day of the state of the union and he was very pessimistic about tax reform. as we were in all those crisis modes and we are about to get in

another. we'll get through this and refund the tax code later. very pessimistic saying people in his caucus just think the will isn't necessarily there because -- >> it's another way they think to raise taxes, right? >> exactly. they've been talking about the fact that they're done with revenue, meaning raising taxes to get to any kind of deal. they're just going to talk about spending. so, that actually was a little bit surprising and kind of depressing. >> but i think, candy, when congress faces the hard choices sequester tees up between firing teachers, kicking kids out of head start and having long lines at the border. what you saw earlier in the show, all those things in closing some loopholes. that loophole closing thing will start to look more attractive. >> i have to say since i don't have any time left, you totally disagree with that. >> i do. people completely forget that it was sequesteration was jack's idea to get the